Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CognitiveCarbon's avatar

I appreciate all of you who have commented here, regardless of your position. I only remove comments that are machine-generated gibberish or use offensive language. Thank you all for actively engaging; Randell Mills is a controversial figure, to be sure. He's always been a lightning rod for criticism, deserved or not. As I stated in my reply below, I have chosen to do whatever I can to help him close the gaps and look for ways to bridge his weaknesses, to try to (finally) get a product to market. He is brilliant and sincere, filled with a wide-ranging curiosity and intensity in focus, and through the years that has kept me engaged with him, despite his flaws and despite the critics. More to come here and elsewhere; Mills is now doing some podcast interviews, which I may be able to help facilitate in the coming months as well.

Expand full comment
Bilbo'sBitch's avatar

Thomas Kuhn, "The structure of scientific Revolutions" 1970's

Then there is Persig "Zen and the art of Motorcycle Maintenance", same-same 1970's

Both of these books go deep into the dogmatism & moronity of "GOV Science"

IMHO the greatest era of 'science' was when rich men like Benjamin Franklin, took up 'electricity' as hobby, then obsession, because of their wealth, they would build their own research labs; Same for Edision, ... Faraday finding rich men to support them.

Now today, you have GOV science, which is the Worst kind of Ayn Rand dystopian 1984 people making all decisions in Science, which is how we end up with mRNA still being debated, and global-warming, and the entire earth being MANAGED by HOMO assholes

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts