Hydrogen has the highest specific energy of all combustible fuels. There may now be a way to get 200 times as much energy from it than burning it--without needing fusion. An energy revolution awaits
Interesting that the man in the video (I remember him from years ago) mentions Verner von Braun who, I just recently heard, is Elon Musk's father ?!?!?
"We were unable to reproduce these results, even though our microwave setup was very similar, and our spectrometer was even better suited for these EUV wavelengths."
"There are two problems with [Mills’] the wave equation."
"The excess power generation, predicted by Mills, is not reproduced. The excessive broadening of the Balmer lines, conversely, is." [csg: but was later found to be due to charge exchange]
------------
Also, NASA spent some time trying to replicate stuff, but didn't see anything sufficiently unusual to be worth pursuing.
Also Jansson, Rowan u 2002 spent some time trying to make a hydrino-based rocket, but stopped trying eventually. I mean, that's a failure right. If you try to do something and don't manage?
To me it looks like there are *loads* of failures.
edit: one more (there are others too, if I had time to find them):
It will literally take me days to study and absorb everything about this. I must say, I'm looking forward to it. Thanks for the thought provoking article!
A couple of terms led me to these videos, for anyone (like myself) interested to dive deeper from a surface start.
I'm back! FYI, hydrazine is a hypergolic liquid fuel that can be used as either as a monopropellant with a catalyst or a bipropellant when used in combination with an oxidizer, such as dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4). MMH/N2O4 was used on shuttle for its Orbital Maneuvering System / Reaction Control System (OMS/RCS) pods which, while they could be and were used on rare occasions during ascent, weren't generally used for orbital insertion. Solid rocket motors, such as the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) on shuttle do not contain hydrazine and are most-commonly powered by "solid" composites of ammonium nitrate- or ammonium perchlorate-based oxidizers in combination with metals such as magnesium or aluminum as fuels. (~ worked Shuttle at Vandenberg before/when Challenger blew up.)
Interesting that the man in the video (I remember him from years ago) mentions Verner von Braun who, I just recently heard, is Elon Musk's father ?!?!?
Best article ever, keep it coming Sir. I’m a CA Central Valley computer tech from a different district, south of you.
Yandex is far more informative than searches controlled by the globalist parasites: https://yandex.com/search/touch/?text=Physics.+“randel+Mills”&mda=0&lr=110200
Very exciting article Sir.
10 sec. search: csg_2 noted many published negative results, below. (Mills' original company, HydroCatalysts, was founded in '91.)
https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/tkb2t6/gutcp_prediction_of_hydrino_reaction_tested_by/
...4 examples of negative results:
Gerrit Kroesen 2008, 4 papers:
https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/46931617/758063-1.pdf
“In none of the conducted experiments are the extraordinary results reproduced that are published by Mills.”
https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/67737806/854079-1.pdf
"In the setup of Mills it is possible that the use of this power supply invalidated results."
"the same power supply is used for the experiments of R.L. Mills [2], it might have contributed to the peculiar results of his experiment."
https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/46930964/756929-1.pdf
"We were unable to reproduce these results, even though our microwave setup was very similar, and our spectrometer was even better suited for these EUV wavelengths."
"There are two problems with [Mills’] the wave equation."
https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/46931320/757950-1.pdf
"The excess power generation, predicted by Mills, is not reproduced. The excessive broadening of the Balmer lines, conversely, is." [csg: but was later found to be due to charge exchange]
------------
Also, NASA spent some time trying to replicate stuff, but didn't see anything sufficiently unusual to be worth pursuing.
Also Jansson, Rowan u 2002 spent some time trying to make a hydrino-based rocket, but stopped trying eventually. I mean, that's a failure right. If you try to do something and don't manage?
To me it looks like there are *loads* of failures.
edit: one more (there are others too, if I had time to find them):
https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/46981437/610097-1.pdf
"Contrary to Mills' observation, no anomalous plasma afterglow has been seen in this type of plasma."
It will literally take me days to study and absorb everything about this. I must say, I'm looking forward to it. Thanks for the thought provoking article!
A couple of terms led me to these videos, for anyone (like myself) interested to dive deeper from a surface start.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOHYT5q5lhQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS3GQk9ETRU
I'm back! FYI, hydrazine is a hypergolic liquid fuel that can be used as either as a monopropellant with a catalyst or a bipropellant when used in combination with an oxidizer, such as dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4). MMH/N2O4 was used on shuttle for its Orbital Maneuvering System / Reaction Control System (OMS/RCS) pods which, while they could be and were used on rare occasions during ascent, weren't generally used for orbital insertion. Solid rocket motors, such as the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) on shuttle do not contain hydrazine and are most-commonly powered by "solid" composites of ammonium nitrate- or ammonium perchlorate-based oxidizers in combination with metals such as magnesium or aluminum as fuels. (~ worked Shuttle at Vandenberg before/when Challenger blew up.)