We've been misled to believe that money, a medium of exchange for wealth, IS wealth. It isn't. Energy is the ultimate wealth, and control over access to energy is the true expression of power.
CognitiveCarbon is not wrong- it's all about energy. I spent many years researching science from 150yrs ago to present. I was unsatisfied with many of prevailing scientific theories for origins of the universe among other things. I wondered if experts made a mistake along the way? Maybe some of these age old ideas like Ether were correct? I set out to find the truth and ended up falling down the rabbit hole, finding evidence of conspiracy. Not what I was expecting but it was hard to deny. I didn't spend long on the conspiracy angle but the science was amazing. I've thought about talking about some of what I learned but honestly it seems insignificant next to fragile state of world affairs. Maybe it's what God needed me to see to care about politics and world events? I'm not sure. If America emerges triumphant, and there's reason to hope, science will propel us in new directions hard to imagine. I realize it's a world of lies and I've proved nothing to you, one guy expressing an optimistic opinion. ;o)
Following-up: I created a group on TS and posting facts/evidence as well as some speculation on a few of the more remarkable technologies I've stumbled upon in my researches. Form your own opinions as always. https://truthsocial.com/group/suppressed-science
>Energy, along with matter, are the two fundamental components of the Universe.
You’re missing one, and so are the elites (although you do touch on it).
Information.
For the elites plans to work long term, information needs to be a conserved property of the universe. Unlike matter-energy, however, information does not seem to be conserved. It can be created (and, potentially, destroyed?).
We know that the amount of information in the universe is increasing (David Layzer 1975):
This puts pay to popular ideas of determinism and all that would be mean.
And it begs the most profound question — where is this information coming from?
Perhaps I remain a skeptic of “free energy” devices. The energy must come from somewhere. However, I do not dismiss it and hold out hope. Certainly, I agree that money is ultimately a proxy for energy.
It is common, for example, to categorise potential alien civilisations by their means to manage energy as: type 1 - 3. This is known as "Kardashev Scale". We are, however, a type 0 civilisation at the moment.
I did touch on information; I expressed the idea that it is a form of potential energy. "Fat stores for the future" was the analogy I used.
What is discussed here--and that doctor Randell Mills is working on--is not a form of "free energy" or "zero-point energy." Nor is it some perpetual motion fallacy.
It is simply a vastly more efficient way to extract energy from hydrogen than conventional combustion allows.
The promise that it holds is virtually unlimited power production at very low cost at the point of use--thus eliminating the central generation chokehold and producing essentially no environmental degradation.
If Mills is correct, the byproduct--H2(1/4) which he dubs hydrino--has a predicted orbital radius smaller than helium, and like helium, simply escapes the atmosphere into space.
Not a theoretical response, but this is how I think of information: societies have always created enough information to serve the purposes of the social organization. For instance, wills, deeds, laws, and bills of sale have been around in some form for thousands of years. They were relatively expensive to create but were sufficient for the purpose. Now information & processing are profoundly cheap and widely available, so there is much more of it. So much in fact, that it is fraught with noise and misinformation - intentional or not. Anybody can create and consume it. This is the current battle that the traditional power structure is currently fighting by crude "fact checks" and bots as some information is not intended for public consumption.
While its true that anyone can consume "information", not everyone consumes it equally (i.e., produces something else of greater value post consumption), and not everyone creates information with the same degree of "Quality".
I capitalize "Quality" here in honor of Phaedrus from Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. "Quality" of Information correlates in some sense to entropy; I would argue that some information has lower entropy (more "content", less "randomness") than other "information".
But like Phaedrus, while I intuitively know what "Quality" means here, it is difficult to properly describe ("you know Quality when you see it.")
In this sense, that Information is graded by Quality, and Quality correlates to entropy, entropy is still the key factor. There is something really deep and interesting hiding in the rabbit hole that contains energy, entropy, and the evolution of the future Universe (the topic of my unfinished book.)
Not sure I follow about the definition of quality information you present. Information with low entropy has a low measure of information. For example, if I write:
00000000000000000000
This contains little information because it can be represented as “0” repeated 20 times. It doesn’t matter if we give a 1000 zeros, the information content would remain the same. This is the basis of information theory and compression.
Information “messages” with high entropy gives a higher corresponding measure.
For example:
01101001011101001111
Could not be efficiently compressed.
>In this sense, that Information is graded by Quality, and Quality correlates to entropy, entropy is still the key factor.
See Claud Shannon information theory. I wrote a little information calculator a while back:
In effect, information is a “measure of surprise”. Others define information in terms of “negative entropy”. I suggest that this does not mean statements of repeating symbols, but that which allows a system to create or order from chaos. A system which is not fed with or does not self-generate information will either decay or ossify.
Modern discrete computers don’t generate information. They merely transform it. Likewise, algorithmic structures of control will not cause people to produce interesting things. Rather, society will just decay and collapse.
But yes, I do strongly agree that there is something really deep and interesting hiding in the Universe. Strange that randomness gives the maximum measure of information, isn’t it?
This is a great comment, and I'm quite familar with Claude Shannon. I like the idea that information is a "measure of surprise". That's a good lens to apply. In writing this post, I'm addressing it to a broader audience, so the terms like 'information' and 'Quality' are not as rigorously defined as how they are used in Information Theory.
Off topic of this article, but I didn't know of another way to reach you! I am curious on your thoughts or knowledge of any theories on the origins of "instructional Information." Is there a cogent theory around, or perhaps a source you can point me to for further study? I cannot find anything about it anywhere.
Great article, and a great condensation of a vast topic. Though I don't have direct evidence, I take the view that this holy grail of personal, practically infinite free energy has been already accomplished, perhaps decades ago. The interests of the parasite oligarchy practically demand that they would keep such a breakthrough completely buried - and my suspicion is that Mills is likely heading into a cul-de-sac precisely because he is being allowed to proceed. I suspect our real breakthrough will occur very soon, simply because the multi-millenial parasite cabal is being systematically dismantled now anyway. Just my musings.
If Mills is really onto something, it will take several decades for the transition to unfold to "personal devices". At first, the devices will be difficult to manufacture, operate, and maintain. The elites can make plenty of money in the manufacturing, and they won't have to worry about loosing petroleum sales because we will always need plastics and other petrochemicals. Operation and maintenance considerations mean continued centralization for several decades, but on a more local level, of about one mini-powerplant for about 10,000 people. Then later, micro-powerplants for neighborhoods. I think personal devices will be rare; these are not like photovoltaic panels that you put on the roof and forget about. So this is no threat to rational elites. On the other hand, psychopathic elites, that like to dominate other people for pleasure, may be threatened, but not for economic reasons per se.
So.....having some idea of what people claim that Mr. Tesla may have discovered in the past, I am a bit concerned for Mr. Mills' safety. This would change the world. It used to astound me that the powerful didn't see how it would actually benefit them to have people prosper.
Take some of the dictators who keep their people in poverty while they themselves live in extraordinary comfort, and what wealth their country would have if they would simply empower their people to prosper with the resources to which they have access.
It only proves the existence of satan, along with the deep evil forces empowered by him in the physical world. Those despotic leaders MUST be controlled and funded by outside entities taking advantage of the resources, otherwise it would not make any sense at all to keep their people in squalor.
This reminds me a bit of that guy who created that power reactor that could support 100 homes (I believe it was carbon energy) and then his reactor was burned down. I have the film about it...you probably already know all about that :)
Mills is an enigma, and his situation regarding the elites is quite interesting in ways I can't get into here. I visited him several times from 2015 to 2021 and asked him point blank once how he protects himself from being "taken out". He answered that his patent applications being publicly available as well as his three books and all his papers being online and freely available are his defense. He could have conducted his research in "stealth mode", clandestinely in some secret lab, but he chose transparency. I admire him greatly and its an honor to be his friend.
That's true in many respects. Most certainly, it would obliterate most existing political structures; the creation of "cultures of dependency" would cease and the apparatus of the state that encourages and feeds this dependency would wither. Economic enslavement would die off. A Golden Era, for sure.
No, the gratitude is on my part. You are doing what I wish I myself could do but I'm not quite up to the task. Nonetheless, I do have the capacity to recognise and appreciate when someone else articulates the thoughts that run through my own head 24/7.
After two years of having been just about wiped out by the planned destruction of the world economy and having lost my business as a consequence, I am now in a place where I hope soon to be able to contribute to your substack page as paid subscriber.
How do you see the rollout of energy devices such as you described being released? The Cabal you mention would never allow such a thing to disrupt their power. And a followup - If energy devices like this were released and owned on a mass scale, where do you see the importance of metal commodities? Gold, silver, iron, copper, etc? Does the power dynamic then switch from who owns the energy to who owns the means by which energy can be transmitted, shared, or stored?
It's a good observation that the "Cabal" would never allow such a thing to disrupt their power, and I've been watching carefully for signs of their actions. This fact may be the explanation for what is going on the world right now: a hidden strategy to protect the status quo. I know Dr. Mills personally and asked him once how he protects himself against this; his answer was that he published all of his materials to the world as a means of defense (his books can be freely downloaded from brilliantlightpower.com and I have a few hardcopies myself.) As for metals: it turns out that the amount of copper needed worldwide would actually decrease, because while these new devices require some amount of copper and other metals, they require far less even in aggregate than what currently goes into power stations, transformers, transmission lines, etc. But yes, there likely would be a struggle of sorts over controlling the necessary metals, and as the current fiasco in the nickel market shows, it can be spectacularly bad. These new energy devices will be "produced at the point of use" power, so there won't be a need for transmission, or storage.
Upon some very preliminary reading through the site (brilliantlightpower.com) I can see why you were attracted to this product! Right up your alley, working with Dark Matter. An incredibly interesting week of reading precedes me. Dr. Mills is a brave man to be publishing his work publicly - I pray his work becomes widespread. Have you seen any evidence yet of the "Cabal" powers targeting him or his work, yet?
With regard to the "Cabal" : no comment at present. Careful observation is underway.
Be sure to look through Mills "publications" link at that site, which is where his books are. Have to warn you, they are not light reading, a math and physics background is definitely required for the details (but not needed to absorb the big picture.)
Thank you sir! No extensive physics background for me, although I have done my fair share of extracurricular reading on the subject. I did see the books on the site, and I'd like to read through them to understand the subject better. This intrigues me, because it really is such a massive (potential) disruption in the energy industry - which is exactly what we need. The way I see it, we have a multi-front war being waged against the "powers that be." With Starlink enabling the decentralization of internet highways, crypto in the financial space, Truth Social, Gab, TG (and others) in the social/information space, and now this with energy....it seems like we have a very realistic chance of derailing the centralized powers that seek to rule.
CognitiveCarbon is not wrong- it's all about energy. I spent many years researching science from 150yrs ago to present. I was unsatisfied with many of prevailing scientific theories for origins of the universe among other things. I wondered if experts made a mistake along the way? Maybe some of these age old ideas like Ether were correct? I set out to find the truth and ended up falling down the rabbit hole, finding evidence of conspiracy. Not what I was expecting but it was hard to deny. I didn't spend long on the conspiracy angle but the science was amazing. I've thought about talking about some of what I learned but honestly it seems insignificant next to fragile state of world affairs. Maybe it's what God needed me to see to care about politics and world events? I'm not sure. If America emerges triumphant, and there's reason to hope, science will propel us in new directions hard to imagine. I realize it's a world of lies and I've proved nothing to you, one guy expressing an optimistic opinion. ;o)
Following-up: I created a group on TS and posting facts/evidence as well as some speculation on a few of the more remarkable technologies I've stumbled upon in my researches. Form your own opinions as always. https://truthsocial.com/group/suppressed-science
>Energy, along with matter, are the two fundamental components of the Universe.
You’re missing one, and so are the elites (although you do touch on it).
Information.
For the elites plans to work long term, information needs to be a conserved property of the universe. Unlike matter-energy, however, information does not seem to be conserved. It can be created (and, potentially, destroyed?).
We know that the amount of information in the universe is increasing (David Layzer 1975):
https://informationphilosopher.com/freedom/laplaces_demon.html
This puts pay to popular ideas of determinism and all that would be mean.
And it begs the most profound question — where is this information coming from?
Perhaps I remain a skeptic of “free energy” devices. The energy must come from somewhere. However, I do not dismiss it and hold out hope. Certainly, I agree that money is ultimately a proxy for energy.
It is common, for example, to categorise potential alien civilisations by their means to manage energy as: type 1 - 3. This is known as "Kardashev Scale". We are, however, a type 0 civilisation at the moment.
I did touch on information; I expressed the idea that it is a form of potential energy. "Fat stores for the future" was the analogy I used.
What is discussed here--and that doctor Randell Mills is working on--is not a form of "free energy" or "zero-point energy." Nor is it some perpetual motion fallacy.
It is simply a vastly more efficient way to extract energy from hydrogen than conventional combustion allows.
The promise that it holds is virtually unlimited power production at very low cost at the point of use--thus eliminating the central generation chokehold and producing essentially no environmental degradation.
If Mills is correct, the byproduct--H2(1/4) which he dubs hydrino--has a predicted orbital radius smaller than helium, and like helium, simply escapes the atmosphere into space.
Not a theoretical response, but this is how I think of information: societies have always created enough information to serve the purposes of the social organization. For instance, wills, deeds, laws, and bills of sale have been around in some form for thousands of years. They were relatively expensive to create but were sufficient for the purpose. Now information & processing are profoundly cheap and widely available, so there is much more of it. So much in fact, that it is fraught with noise and misinformation - intentional or not. Anybody can create and consume it. This is the current battle that the traditional power structure is currently fighting by crude "fact checks" and bots as some information is not intended for public consumption.
While its true that anyone can consume "information", not everyone consumes it equally (i.e., produces something else of greater value post consumption), and not everyone creates information with the same degree of "Quality".
I capitalize "Quality" here in honor of Phaedrus from Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. "Quality" of Information correlates in some sense to entropy; I would argue that some information has lower entropy (more "content", less "randomness") than other "information".
But like Phaedrus, while I intuitively know what "Quality" means here, it is difficult to properly describe ("you know Quality when you see it.")
In this sense, that Information is graded by Quality, and Quality correlates to entropy, entropy is still the key factor. There is something really deep and interesting hiding in the rabbit hole that contains energy, entropy, and the evolution of the future Universe (the topic of my unfinished book.)
Not sure I follow about the definition of quality information you present. Information with low entropy has a low measure of information. For example, if I write:
00000000000000000000
This contains little information because it can be represented as “0” repeated 20 times. It doesn’t matter if we give a 1000 zeros, the information content would remain the same. This is the basis of information theory and compression.
Information “messages” with high entropy gives a higher corresponding measure.
For example:
01101001011101001111
Could not be efficiently compressed.
>In this sense, that Information is graded by Quality, and Quality correlates to entropy, entropy is still the key factor.
See Claud Shannon information theory. I wrote a little information calculator a while back:
https://github.com/kuiperzone/Shannon-Calculator
In effect, information is a “measure of surprise”. Others define information in terms of “negative entropy”. I suggest that this does not mean statements of repeating symbols, but that which allows a system to create or order from chaos. A system which is not fed with or does not self-generate information will either decay or ossify.
Modern discrete computers don’t generate information. They merely transform it. Likewise, algorithmic structures of control will not cause people to produce interesting things. Rather, society will just decay and collapse.
But yes, I do strongly agree that there is something really deep and interesting hiding in the Universe. Strange that randomness gives the maximum measure of information, isn’t it?
This is a great comment, and I'm quite familar with Claude Shannon. I like the idea that information is a "measure of surprise". That's a good lens to apply. In writing this post, I'm addressing it to a broader audience, so the terms like 'information' and 'Quality' are not as rigorously defined as how they are used in Information Theory.
Off topic of this article, but I didn't know of another way to reach you! I am curious on your thoughts or knowledge of any theories on the origins of "instructional Information." Is there a cogent theory around, or perhaps a source you can point me to for further study? I cannot find anything about it anywhere.
Great article, and a great condensation of a vast topic. Though I don't have direct evidence, I take the view that this holy grail of personal, practically infinite free energy has been already accomplished, perhaps decades ago. The interests of the parasite oligarchy practically demand that they would keep such a breakthrough completely buried - and my suspicion is that Mills is likely heading into a cul-de-sac precisely because he is being allowed to proceed. I suspect our real breakthrough will occur very soon, simply because the multi-millenial parasite cabal is being systematically dismantled now anyway. Just my musings.
If Mills is really onto something, it will take several decades for the transition to unfold to "personal devices". At first, the devices will be difficult to manufacture, operate, and maintain. The elites can make plenty of money in the manufacturing, and they won't have to worry about loosing petroleum sales because we will always need plastics and other petrochemicals. Operation and maintenance considerations mean continued centralization for several decades, but on a more local level, of about one mini-powerplant for about 10,000 people. Then later, micro-powerplants for neighborhoods. I think personal devices will be rare; these are not like photovoltaic panels that you put on the roof and forget about. So this is no threat to rational elites. On the other hand, psychopathic elites, that like to dominate other people for pleasure, may be threatened, but not for economic reasons per se.
So.....having some idea of what people claim that Mr. Tesla may have discovered in the past, I am a bit concerned for Mr. Mills' safety. This would change the world. It used to astound me that the powerful didn't see how it would actually benefit them to have people prosper.
Take some of the dictators who keep their people in poverty while they themselves live in extraordinary comfort, and what wealth their country would have if they would simply empower their people to prosper with the resources to which they have access.
It only proves the existence of satan, along with the deep evil forces empowered by him in the physical world. Those despotic leaders MUST be controlled and funded by outside entities taking advantage of the resources, otherwise it would not make any sense at all to keep their people in squalor.
This reminds me a bit of that guy who created that power reactor that could support 100 homes (I believe it was carbon energy) and then his reactor was burned down. I have the film about it...you probably already know all about that :)
Mills is an enigma, and his situation regarding the elites is quite interesting in ways I can't get into here. I visited him several times from 2015 to 2021 and asked him point blank once how he protects himself from being "taken out". He answered that his patent applications being publicly available as well as his three books and all his papers being online and freely available are his defense. He could have conducted his research in "stealth mode", clandestinely in some secret lab, but he chose transparency. I admire him greatly and its an honor to be his friend.
I've said it before myself. If we had "unlimited" access to energy, it would change the face of this planet.
That's true in many respects. Most certainly, it would obliterate most existing political structures; the creation of "cultures of dependency" would cease and the apparatus of the state that encourages and feeds this dependency would wither. Economic enslavement would die off. A Golden Era, for sure.
This isn't just excellent thinking, it's also excellent writing which is a pleasure to read.
You are very kind! Thank you for the encouragement.
No, the gratitude is on my part. You are doing what I wish I myself could do but I'm not quite up to the task. Nonetheless, I do have the capacity to recognise and appreciate when someone else articulates the thoughts that run through my own head 24/7.
After two years of having been just about wiped out by the planned destruction of the world economy and having lost my business as a consequence, I am now in a place where I hope soon to be able to contribute to your substack page as paid subscriber.
You are doing important work and I appreciate it.
How do you see the rollout of energy devices such as you described being released? The Cabal you mention would never allow such a thing to disrupt their power. And a followup - If energy devices like this were released and owned on a mass scale, where do you see the importance of metal commodities? Gold, silver, iron, copper, etc? Does the power dynamic then switch from who owns the energy to who owns the means by which energy can be transmitted, shared, or stored?
It's a good observation that the "Cabal" would never allow such a thing to disrupt their power, and I've been watching carefully for signs of their actions. This fact may be the explanation for what is going on the world right now: a hidden strategy to protect the status quo. I know Dr. Mills personally and asked him once how he protects himself against this; his answer was that he published all of his materials to the world as a means of defense (his books can be freely downloaded from brilliantlightpower.com and I have a few hardcopies myself.) As for metals: it turns out that the amount of copper needed worldwide would actually decrease, because while these new devices require some amount of copper and other metals, they require far less even in aggregate than what currently goes into power stations, transformers, transmission lines, etc. But yes, there likely would be a struggle of sorts over controlling the necessary metals, and as the current fiasco in the nickel market shows, it can be spectacularly bad. These new energy devices will be "produced at the point of use" power, so there won't be a need for transmission, or storage.
Upon some very preliminary reading through the site (brilliantlightpower.com) I can see why you were attracted to this product! Right up your alley, working with Dark Matter. An incredibly interesting week of reading precedes me. Dr. Mills is a brave man to be publishing his work publicly - I pray his work becomes widespread. Have you seen any evidence yet of the "Cabal" powers targeting him or his work, yet?
With regard to the "Cabal" : no comment at present. Careful observation is underway.
Be sure to look through Mills "publications" link at that site, which is where his books are. Have to warn you, they are not light reading, a math and physics background is definitely required for the details (but not needed to absorb the big picture.)
May I also suggest reading Brett Hoverstott's book about Mills and Hydrino, available on Amazon; and also, read this paper, if you have some physics background. https://fondationlouisdebroglie.org/AFLB-302/aflb302m185.pdf
Thank you sir! No extensive physics background for me, although I have done my fair share of extracurricular reading on the subject. I did see the books on the site, and I'd like to read through them to understand the subject better. This intrigues me, because it really is such a massive (potential) disruption in the energy industry - which is exactly what we need. The way I see it, we have a multi-front war being waged against the "powers that be." With Starlink enabling the decentralization of internet highways, crypto in the financial space, Truth Social, Gab, TG (and others) in the social/information space, and now this with energy....it seems like we have a very realistic chance of derailing the centralized powers that seek to rule.
Take a look at this site, too. The videos are intriguing. https://safireproject.com/