24 Comments
Oct 12, 2022Liked by CognitiveCarbon

CognitiveCarbon is not wrong- it's all about energy. I spent many years researching science from 150yrs ago to present. I was unsatisfied with many of prevailing scientific theories for origins of the universe among other things. I wondered if experts made a mistake along the way? Maybe some of these age old ideas like Ether were correct? I set out to find the truth and ended up falling down the rabbit hole, finding evidence of conspiracy. Not what I was expecting but it was hard to deny. I didn't spend long on the conspiracy angle but the science was amazing. I've thought about talking about some of what I learned but honestly it seems insignificant next to fragile state of world affairs. Maybe it's what God needed me to see to care about politics and world events? I'm not sure. If America emerges triumphant, and there's reason to hope, science will propel us in new directions hard to imagine. I realize it's a world of lies and I've proved nothing to you, one guy expressing an optimistic opinion. ;o)

Expand full comment
May 3, 2022Liked by CognitiveCarbon

>Energy, along with matter, are the two fundamental components of the Universe.

You’re missing one, and so are the elites (although you do touch on it).

Information.

For the elites plans to work long term, information needs to be a conserved property of the universe. Unlike matter-energy, however, information does not seem to be conserved. It can be created (and, potentially, destroyed?).

We know that the amount of information in the universe is increasing (David Layzer 1975):

https://informationphilosopher.com/freedom/laplaces_demon.html

This puts pay to popular ideas of determinism and all that would be mean.

And it begs the most profound question — where is this information coming from?

Perhaps I remain a skeptic of “free energy” devices. The energy must come from somewhere. However, I do not dismiss it and hold out hope. Certainly, I agree that money is ultimately a proxy for energy.

It is common, for example, to categorise potential alien civilisations by their means to manage energy as: type 1 - 3. This is known as "Kardashev Scale". We are, however, a type 0 civilisation at the moment.

Expand full comment

Off topic of this article, but I didn't know of another way to reach you! I am curious on your thoughts or knowledge of any theories on the origins of "instructional Information." Is there a cogent theory around, or perhaps a source you can point me to for further study? I cannot find anything about it anywhere.

Expand full comment

Great article, and a great condensation of a vast topic. Though I don't have direct evidence, I take the view that this holy grail of personal, practically infinite free energy has been already accomplished, perhaps decades ago. The interests of the parasite oligarchy practically demand that they would keep such a breakthrough completely buried - and my suspicion is that Mills is likely heading into a cul-de-sac precisely because he is being allowed to proceed. I suspect our real breakthrough will occur very soon, simply because the multi-millenial parasite cabal is being systematically dismantled now anyway. Just my musings.

Expand full comment
Apr 7, 2022·edited Apr 7, 2022

If Mills is really onto something, it will take several decades for the transition to unfold to "personal devices". At first, the devices will be difficult to manufacture, operate, and maintain. The elites can make plenty of money in the manufacturing, and they won't have to worry about loosing petroleum sales because we will always need plastics and other petrochemicals. Operation and maintenance considerations mean continued centralization for several decades, but on a more local level, of about one mini-powerplant for about 10,000 people. Then later, micro-powerplants for neighborhoods. I think personal devices will be rare; these are not like photovoltaic panels that you put on the roof and forget about. So this is no threat to rational elites. On the other hand, psychopathic elites, that like to dominate other people for pleasure, may be threatened, but not for economic reasons per se.

Expand full comment
Mar 24, 2022Liked by CognitiveCarbon

So.....having some idea of what people claim that Mr. Tesla may have discovered in the past, I am a bit concerned for Mr. Mills' safety. This would change the world. It used to astound me that the powerful didn't see how it would actually benefit them to have people prosper.

Take some of the dictators who keep their people in poverty while they themselves live in extraordinary comfort, and what wealth their country would have if they would simply empower their people to prosper with the resources to which they have access.

It only proves the existence of satan, along with the deep evil forces empowered by him in the physical world. Those despotic leaders MUST be controlled and funded by outside entities taking advantage of the resources, otherwise it would not make any sense at all to keep their people in squalor.

This reminds me a bit of that guy who created that power reactor that could support 100 homes (I believe it was carbon energy) and then his reactor was burned down. I have the film about it...you probably already know all about that :)

Expand full comment

I've said it before myself. If we had "unlimited" access to energy, it would change the face of this planet.

Expand full comment

This isn't just excellent thinking, it's also excellent writing which is a pleasure to read.

Expand full comment

How do you see the rollout of energy devices such as you described being released? The Cabal you mention would never allow such a thing to disrupt their power. And a followup - If energy devices like this were released and owned on a mass scale, where do you see the importance of metal commodities? Gold, silver, iron, copper, etc? Does the power dynamic then switch from who owns the energy to who owns the means by which energy can be transmitted, shared, or stored?

Expand full comment